Code, cameras, and things that matter.

The [AI] models are already powerful enough to produce publishable results under competent supervision. That’s not the bottleneck. The bottleneck is the supervision. Stronger models won’t eliminate the need for a human who understands the physics; they’ll just broaden the range of problems that a supervised agent can tackle. The supervisor still needs to know what the answer should look like, still needs to know which checks to demand, still needs to have the instinct that something is off before they can articulate why. That instinct doesn’t come from a subscription. It comes from years of failing at exactly the kind of work that people keep calling grunt work. Making the models smarter doesn’t solve the problem. It makes the problem harder to see.

The friction of building personal apps has always been so high that as users we accepted the ads, the trackers, the dark patterns, and the constant upsells.

The friction is just not there anymore. You can build a personal app that has the exact subset of features you want, that is clean, fast, and respects your privacy, in a matter of hours.

It's getting hard to justify app stores

The app store model is broken, and it's only going to get worse with AI.

https://codemade.net

The way a smart assistant works is, it processes information ahead of you, trims it down, and presents you with a couple of options to decide on.

The way most people now use AI tools is the exact opposite. They’d gather all the information, throw it at the AI tool, and ask it to choose an option for them.

Who is, then, the assistant?

Time to dust it off. It has been hanging around here for quite some time. But hey, warmer spring days are just around the corner!